ACS Publisher

Research Results Misappropriation

Research results misappropriation involves the use of another researcher's findings, data, or results without proper permission or attribution. This type of misconduct undermines the principles of transparency, trust, and integrity in the scientific community. ISRR takes allegations of research results misappropriation very seriously and has established comprehensive guidelines to address such complaints.

Definition and Scope

Research results misappropriation can manifest in various forms, including but not limited to:

  1. Unauthorized Use of Data: Using another researcher's raw data or results without obtaining permission or giving appropriate credit.
  2. Misrepresentation of Collaborations: Presenting research results as part of a collaboration without the consent of all involved parties.
  3. Improper Attribution: Failing to acknowledge the original source of data or findings when using them in subsequent research.
  4. Pre-publication Misappropriation: Using information from a manuscript under review for personal gain or publishing it without consent.

Handling Research Results Misappropriation Complaints

Initial Assessment

Upon receiving a complaint regarding research results misappropriation, the editorial office conducts an initial assessment to determine the nature and scope of the complaint. This involves:

  1. Reviewing the Complaint: Examining the details of the complaint to understand the specific type of misappropriation being alleged.
  2. Gathering Initial Information: Collecting preliminary information from the complainant, including any supporting documents, communications, and evidence that highlight the potential misappropriation.

The initial assessment helps to establish whether the complaint falls within the scope of publishing ethics and if it requires a formal investigation.

Confidentiality and Anonymity

Throughout the process, confidentiality will be maintained to protect the identities of all parties involved. If the complainant wishes to remain anonymous, ISRR will respect this request while ensuring a fair and thorough investigation.

Notification and Response

If the initial assessment indicates that the complaint warrants further investigation, the following steps will be taken:

  1. Notification of Relevant Parties: The corresponding author of the publication in question will be informed about the complaint and requested to provide a response within a specified timeframe.
  2. Communication with All Authors: All listed authors will be notified of the complaint and asked to provide their perspectives and any relevant documentation regarding their use of research results.

The goal of this step is to gather comprehensive information from all parties involved to understand the circumstances surrounding the alleged misappropriation.

Formation of an Investigation Committee

To ensure an impartial and thorough investigation, a committee of experts with no conflicts of interest in the case will be formed. This committee will be responsible for reviewing all evidence and making a determination regarding the complaint.

Evidence Collection

The investigation committee will gather all relevant documents, communications, and data related to the complaint. This may involve:

  1. Reviewing Research Data: Examining the research data and results that are alleged to have been misappropriated.
  2. Comparing Publications: Comparing the accused publication with the original research to identify any overlaps or misappropriations.
  3. Collecting Statements: Requesting statements from all authors describing their use of research results and the sources of their data.
  4. Examining Correspondence: Reviewing email communications and other correspondence between authors and with external collaborators to understand the decision-making process regarding the use of research results.

Decision-Making Process

The investigation committee will review all collected evidence and statements to determine the validity of the complaint. The decision-making process includes:

  1. Evaluation of Evidence: Assessing the credibility and weight of the evidence presented. This involves cross-referencing research data, examining publication records, and reviewing correspondence to verify the use of research results.
  2. Consensus Building: Reaching a consensus on whether the complaint is substantiated or unsubstantiated. The committee will consider the extent of the misappropriation, the nature of the use of research results, and the context of the research collaborations.
  3. Recommendation of Actions: Recommending appropriate actions based on the findings, which may include corrections to the publication record, retractions, or other measures.

Communication of Findings

The findings of the investigation will be communicated to all relevant parties, including the complainant and the authors. This communication will include:

  1. Summary of Findings: Providing a detailed summary of the investigation's findings and the rationale for the decision.
  2. Recommended Actions: Describing any recommended actions and the steps that will be taken to implement them. This may include issuing corrections or retractions in the journal.
  3. Appeal Process: Informing the parties about the process for appealing the decision, if applicable.

Implementation of Actions

The recommended actions will be implemented promptly to address the complaint and prevent future occurrences. This may involve:

  1. Corrections to the Publication Record: Issuing a correction to the publication record in the journal if changes are warranted. This ensures that the publication history is accurate and transparent.
  2. Retractions: Retracting the paper if the misappropriation is extensive and impacts the integrity of the research. This step is taken only in cases where the issue significantly affects the validity of the research findings.
  3. Policy Changes: Implementing changes to editorial policies or procedures to prevent similar issues in the future. This may include revising guidelines on the use of research results and the attribution of sources.
  4. Disciplinary Actions: Taking disciplinary actions against individuals found to have engaged in research results misappropriation. This may include a ban on future submissions to the journal for a specified period.

Public Notification

In cases where the misappropriation significantly affects the integrity of the research, a public notification may be issued. This notification will inform the academic community about the misappropriation and the actions taken to address it. The notification will be published in an appropriate section of the journal to ensure transparency and accountability.

Institutional Notification

The institutions affiliated with the authors involved in the misappropriation will be informed about the findings and actions taken. This step ensures that the institutions are aware of the issue and can take appropriate measures to address it within their own policies and procedures.

Documentation and Reporting

All steps of the investigation process will be thoroughly documented to ensure transparency and accountability. This documentation includes:

  1. Records of Communication: Keeping detailed records of all communications related to the complaint. This includes emails, letters, and meeting notes.
  2. Investigation Reports: Maintaining comprehensive reports of the investigation findings and decisions. These reports will be stored securely and may be referenced in future cases to ensure consistency in handling complaints.
  3. Annual Reporting: Including summaries of complaints and their resolutions in annual reports to the journal's editorial board. This helps to monitor trends in research results misappropriation and evaluate the effectiveness of the journal's policies and procedures.

Prevention and Education

To prevent research results misappropriation and promote ethical research practices, ISRR will implement educational initiatives for authors, reviewers, and editors. These initiatives may include:

  1. Workshops on Ethical Use of Research Results: Conducting workshops and seminars on ethical research practices and the proper use of research results. These workshops will provide guidance on how to avoid misappropriation and ensure proper attribution.
  2. Guidelines and Resources: Providing clear guidelines and resources on ethical research practices on the journal's website. This includes detailed explanations of the types of research results misappropriation and best practices for avoiding them.
  3. Collaboration Agreements: Encouraging authors to use formal collaboration agreements that clearly define the use and attribution of research results. This helps to prevent disputes over data ownership and usage.

Continuous Improvement

ISRR is committed to continuously improving its policies and procedures for handling complaints. Regular reviews of the guidelines and feedback from the academic community will be used to refine and enhance the process. This ensures that the journal maintains the highest standards of integrity and transparency in research and publication.

Case Studies and Examples

To provide further clarity on the handling of research results misappropriation, ISRR will develop case studies and examples based on past cases. These case studies will illustrate the application of the guidelines and the outcomes of the investigations. They will serve as educational tools for authors, reviewers, and editors to better understand the implications of misappropriation and the importance of ethical research practices.

Ethical Considerations in Research Collaborations

Research collaborations often involve the sharing and use of data and results. To ensure ethical practices in collaborations, ISRR recommends the following:

  1. Clear Communication: Establish clear communication channels between all collaborators to discuss data ownership, usage rights, and attribution.
  2. Documentation: Maintain thorough documentation of all agreements and decisions related to the use of research results.
  3. Transparency: Ensure transparency in the use of data and results by providing appropriate credit to all contributors.
  4. Conflict Resolution: Have a plan in place for resolving conflicts or disputes that may arise during the collaboration.

Role of Reviewers and Editors

Reviewers and editors play a crucial role in identifying and preventing research results misappropriation. Their responsibilities include:

  1. Vigilance: Being vigilant in identifying potential misappropriation during the peer review process.
  2. Reporting: Reporting any suspicions of misappropriation to the editorial office for further investigation.
  3. Ethical Guidance: Providing ethical guidance to authors on the proper use and attribution of research results.

Conclusion

By adhering to these detailed guidelines for handling research results misappropriation complaints, ISRR aims to uphold the integrity of the research and publication process. Ensuring that all research results are used ethically and with proper attribution fosters trust and credibility within the academic community. Through preventive measures, educational initiatives, and continuous improvement, ISRR is committed to maintaining the highest standards of integrity and transparency in research and publication.